A common VFS and a Common conf-system (Was: namespacing)
Philip Van Hoof
spamfrommailing at freax.org
Tue Mar 1 10:57:19 EET 2005
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 23:45 -0500, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> I'm going to use the prefix vfs_/VFS_. However, that is pretty common,
> and could be in wide use, especially internally to many apps. Since
> this is the Desktop VFS, perhaps the prefix dvfs_ should be used
> instead. The whole thing could be called D-VFS, and then we get cool
> points for the naming conformity with D-BUS. ;-)
I really like the name D-VFS :-p. Just don't waste that name on a
vicious VFS platform that can't be used for some reason. As promised,
I'll join your efforts as soon as I see it actually going somewhere.
Your first/This proposal is, for me, a very good start in terms of
naming. Mommies and Daddies always first choose a name before they give
birth to a new human being, no? :-) (well, most do I'm guessing).
Note sure about the underscores. D-BUS is also using capitalized wording
for it's type-names: DBusConnection, DBusError, DBusWatch. If you're
going to make the link with D-BUS, you might as well reuse it's
> If somebody wants to post this in the Wiki, or tell me where to post
> it, great. Probably better there than several posts on the mailing
Somebody should do that indeed. Actually, the whole group of people who
are doing something thats related to vfs-stuff and who are reading this
should jump into action and join the fun right now :p.
I'm very interested in all this. Keep me and us informed please.
Philip Van Hoof, Software Developer @ Cronos
home: me at freax dot org
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: philip dot vanhoof at cronos dot be
junk: philip dot vanhoof at gmail dot com
More information about the xdg