A common VFS and a Common conf-system (Was: namespacing)

[Sean Middleditch]

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 14:23 +0000, Mike Hearn wrote:
>Hopefully the reason behind the Windows problem was that the Win32
>desktop level VFS API is horrid both to use as a client and a plugin, and
>so we can achieve much higher usage by providing a nicer and more
>widespread API (as opposed to some fundamental property of kernel vs
>desktop level VFS systems).

Hopefully.  ;-)  I rather dislike the POSIX API even for normal-type
stuff, so I'm hoping the D-VFS API will actually be more pleasant to use
than POSIX.  ~_^

>
>thanks -mike
>
>_______________________________________________
>xdg mailing list
>xdg at lists.freedesktop.org
>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
>
-- 
Sean Middleditch <elanthis at awesomeplay.com>