A common VFS and a Common conf-system [Part II]

[Waldo Bastian]

On Tuesday 08 March 2005 03:32, gtg990h at mail.gatech.edu wrote:
> I've been reading with some excitement the D-VFS proposals being thrown
> around on xdg. One thing that seems to have been taken for granted is: is
> it really a good idea to have a seperate filesystem interface just for
> desktop apps?

Yes, think of it in terms of "document access" instead of "file access". There 
is a really big difference between the two in terms of practical usage.

If you have doubt about that come back after you have compiled your kernel 
from floppy disk.

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian at kde.org   |   Free Novell Linux Desktop 9 Evaluation Download
bastian at suse.com  |   http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/eval.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20050308/364d899b/attachment.pgp