[PROPOSAL] Desktop Bookmarks
mclasen at redhat.com
Tue May 10 15:14:26 EEST 2005
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 06:38 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> I agree with your point of view here. Reuse existing formats and
> specifications !
> I didn't violently oppose GMarkup based on the premice that it would not
> be flagged as an XML parser. Using it as a justification for subsetting
> existing standard would break that status-quo.
There is nothing wrong with using a subset of an existing standard. By
now, the XML standards nest has grown to the point where it becomes
a necessity. If the subset you need is included in the XML subset called
GMarkup, then using the GMarkup parser is a lightweight solution.
If not, using a real XML parser will not add much weight either.
More information about the xdg