Icon caching is unusable
Kenneth Wimer
wimer at suse.de
Mon Oct 3 22:30:13 EEST 2005
* Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> [Oct 03. 2005 20:02]:
> On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:55 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 11:26 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> > > If you look at Fedora, this is handled in the %post hook of all packages
> > > that install icons. Installing an icon is a two-step process
> > >
> > > 1) copy the icon to the right directory
> > > 2) touch the toplevel theme directory
> >
> > This is probably the most stupid idea I've heard of on the subject. If
> > you take care of a postinstall script, why do you only touch the
> > toplevel directory instead of generating the cache?
> >
> > And of course, it doesn't take into account the fact that packages
> > currently don't do that.
>
> I don't know what packages you are talking about, but Fedora packages
> take care to update the icon cache when installing icons.
What about icon sets which are not supplied in vendor specific
packaging??
--
Kenneth Wimer
-------------------------------------------------------------
Scheinbare Rechtschreibfehler beruhen auf einer individuellen
Rechtschreibreform
More information about the xdg
mailing list