Icon naming spec suggestions - mimetypes
Jakob Petsovits
jpetso at gmx.at
Tue Dec 25 16:02:25 PST 2007
Hi Rodney (and xdg list, it might be a good read),
I can't do all of them at once (and it's getting late), so here's a start of
suggestions for the naming spec, in email form, for the mimetypes category.
--- What I consider important ---
* font-x-generic
* package-x-generic
Those are a bit problematic to me as you use IANA/fd.o mimetype compliant
names, but these two aren't - IANA doesn't have any "font" or "package"
categories. I would prefer these to be named x-font-generic and
x-package-generic.
--- Wishlist: what I would like to see (but can live without) ---
* application-x-zerosize
The icon used for empty files.
* x-unknown
The icon used for files whose type cannot be determined.
--- Minor: might stay out of the spec, I don't care ---
* application-octet-stream
The icon used for generic binary files.
--- Other stuff ---
* application-certificate
Only in Tango (so you don't have to fix this in the spec), but same issue:
there is no application/certificate mimetype, thus the icon should rather be
named application-x-certificate or something in that vein.
Please keep me up to date when you change something.
More to come,
Jakob
P.S.: is there any way to subscribe to CVS changes of the spec?
More information about the xdg
mailing list