More on the menu spec test suite

dan sinclair zero at
Mon Feb 5 16:23:51 EET 2007

Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> I tried to run the submenu-collision test, which failed with the
> following (slightly simplified) diff:
> --- /tmp/menutestdir/run-result.filtered
> +++ /tmp/menutestdir/required-result.sorted
> +Applications/
>    kate.desktop    /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kate.desktop
> +Applications/
>    kbabel.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kbabel.desktop
> +Applications/
>    KEdit.desktop   /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/KEdit.desktop
> +Applications/
>    kwrite.desktop  /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kwrite.desktop
> +Applications/
>    quanta.desktop  /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/quanta.desktop
> The test includes two menus which both have the name "Applications" and
> contain an <Include> rule. The test expects no output from the
> implementation. If I remember the specification correctly, a new menu
> should be created with the two <Include>'s added, which would look like
> this:

Looking at the results file in the test suite it's expecting the 
desktop's you listed as the results. It looks more like your 
implementation isn't returning any desktop files.


More information about the xdg mailing list