James Richard Tyrer
tyrerj at acm.org
Mon Jul 16 16:50:26 PDT 2007
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Not to sound flippant or dismissive, but... who cares?
You do sound flippant and dismissive. :-D
> It's already how it is, so why make extra work for something that's
> purely an implementation detail that end-users won't see anyway?
As a retired EE, I have to tell you that your attitude is not conducive
to a standards making process. And please note that on KDE that users
do see the names of the icons every time they select an icon.
> If it's necessary to expand the use of emblem-symbolic-link for other
> types of links, this can be noted in the description in the icon
> naming spec.
This is version 0.8. This means that it is expected that changes will
be made before 1.0 is released.
I listed two proper ways to do this -- ways that comply with the spec.
If you think that the current name is correct, and that my suggestions
do not follow the spec, then please comment on that.
More information about the xdg