org.freedesktop.PowerManagement

Richard Hughes hughsient at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 07:36:23 PDT 2007


On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:00 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Friday 30 of March 2007, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:34 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > > On Fri 30. Mar - 13:21:24, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:30 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 00:25 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > > > > > People want to disable gnome power manager on usual desktop
> > > > > > systems.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would disagree with this quite strongly. g-p-m on a desktop loads
> > > > > hardly any modules at runtime (less CPU and memory use) but still
> > > > > controls DPMS and Inhibit control.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lots of desktops suspend and hibernate. I've never told anyone to
> > > > > disable g-p-m on a desktop on a desktop...
> > > >
> > > > yeah, and in those that don't suspend or hibernate, you don't realise
> > > > it's there, since it hardly takes any resources and doesn't show any
> > > > icon on the screen.
> 
>  Uhm ... g-p-m is that little process called gnome-power-manager for which 
> Exmap after GNOME startup claims 2MB of memory used solely by it? Yeah, 
> right, that's surely considered hardly any resources these days and the 
> ability to reboot is well worth it.
> -- 
> Lubos Lunak
> KDE developer

Well, you could contribute to the discussion, or bash GNOME
applications. g-p-m uses a lot of libraries, and loads only the gobjects
for the hardware you have on your system. Try compiling without DPMS and
see the memory reduction.

Richard.





More information about the xdg mailing list