Xesam meta-meta-data spec needs attention.

[Sebastian Trüg]

On Saturday 12 May 2007 17:03:47 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> 2007/5/12, Evgeny Egorochkin <phreedom.stdin at gmail.com>:
> > On Saturday 12 May 2007 13:39:51 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > > > Any
> > > >
> > > > > ideas on a temporary storage idea until we get a subversion module
> >
> > at
> >
> > > > fdo?
> > > >
> > > > Wiki is ok. The only way I see this working is to authorize one
> > > > person
> >
> > to
> >
> > > > make
> > > > changes to the onto. It's too small and has too many internal
> > > > dependencies to
> > > > allow ad-hoc editing. Changes should be proposed, discussed and only
> >
> > then
> >
> > > > committed.
> > > >
> > > > You still can use diff on wiki article contents and send patches for
> > > > discussion/approval.
> > >
> > > Right. The key maintainer would still have to discuss things on the
> > > list
> >
> > I
> >
> > > take it?
> >
> > Absolutely. Not so long ago you personally witnessed the benefits of
> > peer-review.
> >
> > > Anyway, I would like to propose that Evgeny is our ontology-man (if he
> >
> > has
> >
> > > the time (I haven't really talked to him about it)).
> >
> > I believe I'll spend much more time documenting my proposals, so I can
> > handle
> > this as well.
>
> Cool. So it seems we have a taker for this task :-) How do you non-Strigi
> guys feel about this. Please chime in...

Very good idea. I love the fact to have another "sort-of-Nepomuk-speaker" on 
this list. Thanks a lot for the effort, Evgeny. :)

Cheers,
Sebastian