[XESAM] RDF vs .Desktop

[Sebastian Trüg]

Hi Evgeny,

thanks a lot for this example.

On Wednesday 16 May 2007 21:58:54 Evgeny Egorochkin wrote:
> I will provide only one field definition featuring all aspects like
> parents, localization etc. No sense to define several fileds.

I agree.

> First attempt:
>
> =====================================
> @base <http://freedesktop.org/standards/xesam#>
>
> Audio.Composer
> 	a			field;
> 	of_type		string;
> 	has_parent	Content.Creator;
> 	name		"Composer"@EN;
> 	name		"Композитор"@RU;
> 	description	"Audio composer".
> =====================================
>
> Second attempt. This is the one I'd prefer, despite first attempt looking
> slighly better. Note that base url is xesam ns. Xesam: prefix actually
> points to RDF ns, so that we use xesam:Property instead of rdf:property and
> hide rdf traces completely :)
> =====================================
> @prefix xesam:	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>.
> @prefix : 			<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
> @base 			<http://freedesktop.org/standards/xesam#>
>
> Audio.Composer
> 	a				xesam:Property;
>
> 	:range			string;
> 	:subPropertyOf		Content.Creator;
> 	:label			"Composer"@EN;
> 	:label			"Композитор"@RU;
> 	:comment		"Audio composer".
>
> =====================================

I, of course, also vote for the second version since it is clean and 
standard-compliant. This way our ontologies can be used and interconnected 
with every semantic tool and ontology.

Cheers,
Sebastian