[XESAM] RDF vs .Desktop

[Jos van den Oever]

2007/5/16, Evgeny Egorochkin <phreedom.stdin at gmail.com>:
> The reason I'm for the second example is that some external tools will be able
> to extract more semantics from this definition as compared to the first one.
> Nevertheless the first one is a valid RDF.

The second looks better intuitively too. It's very similar to xml+rdf
but without the spacefilling tags. In addition, the format looks
rather simple to me. Parsing it will still involve parsing special
escaped characters though. But i dont think any format can avoid that.

Go Tutle: Achilles cannot catch you.

Cheers,
Jos