[Icon-Naming-Spec] New icons proposal

[Stephan Arts]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stephan Arts <stephan at xfce.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Jakob Petsovits <jpetso at gmx.at> wrote:
>  > On Friday, 18. April 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
>  >  > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:34 +0200, Stephan Arts wrote:
>  >  > > - system-shutdown
>  >  > > - system-reboot
>  >  > > - system-hibernate
>  >  >
>  >  > and system-suspend.
>  >
>  >  For KDE, we've used system-suspend and system-suspend-hibernate, so that the
>  >  latter can fall back to the former if the theme doesn't have both. (Because
>  >  essentially they're both "go to sleep" icons.)
>  >  I would love to see this scheme to be adopted, as I find it to be a nice
>  >  mixture between flexibility and not requiring too much from 3rd party theme
>  >  creators.
>  >
>  >  Also, we used system-restart instead of system-reboot, but that's more likely
>  >  just a matter of taste and a question of "who will need to adapt their icon
>  >  sets".
>  >
>  >
>  >  > There's some tango icons for suspend and hibernate in the
>  >  > gnome-power-manager package if anyone is interested. I would love these
>  >  > to go upstream tho, as we are also using custom icons in the gnome
>  >  > logout UI too.
>  >
>  >  Seconded. With all three of XFCE, GNOME and KDE using those icons, we should
>  >  really get them into the standard.
>
>  system-suspend and system-suspend-hibernate seems a better approach indeed.

Could someone please add these icons to the icon-naming spec?

system-suspend
system-suspend-hibernate
system-reboot


Thanks,

Stephan