Starting discussion on a new version of the notification spec
Brian J. Tarricone
bjt23 at cornell.edu
Sat Jun 13 14:23:53 PDT 2009
On 06/13/2009 02:18 PM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>> 1. Passive vs. active notifications. I recall that notify-osd
>> unilaterally decided that the 'actions' bit of the spec was Bad[tm] and
>> that notifications should be entirely passive and not accept input.
> I would rather not start a discussion on this subject: it has been
> debated to death and people won't change their mind.
That's rather closed-minded. But I suppose if Canonical wants to go
their own way and ignore community consensus, it's free to do so.
More information about the xdg