Starting discussion on a new version of the notification spec

Brian J. Tarricone bjt23 at
Sat Jun 13 14:23:53 PDT 2009

On 06/13/2009 02:18 PM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>> 1.  Passive vs. active notifications.  I recall that notify-osd
>> unilaterally decided that the 'actions' bit of the spec was Bad[tm] and
>> that notifications should be entirely passive and not accept input.
> I would rather not start a discussion on this subject: it has been
> debated to death and people won't change their mind.

That's rather closed-minded.  But I suppose if Canonical wants to go 
their own way and ignore community consensus, it's free to do so.


More information about the xdg mailing list