Summarizing discussion on notification interface name

[Aurélien Gâteau]

Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Since last thread on notifications has turned out to be quite huge. I
> feel it is needed to try to extract something from this large discussion.
> 
> Do we agree on this?
> 
> - The way the Galago project "hijacked" the
> org.freedesktop.Notifications name was not appropriate. We should
> explicitly define a process regarding the attribution of org.freedesktop
> interfaces, even if there is no technical mean to enforce it (Using a
> different namespace until the proposal has been approved, like what has
> been done with org.kde.NotificationItem is a good start IMHO)

Not everyone remembers history the same way and I based my opinion on
comments rather than on mailing-list archives (will download and read
them now). Therefore I would like to get rid of the first sentence of
this item, turning it into this:

- We should explicitly define a process regarding the attribution of
org.freedesktop interfaces, even if there is no technical mean to
enforce it (Using a different namespace until the proposal has been
approved, like what has been done with org.kde.NotificationItem, is a
good start IMHO)

Aurélien