DBus properties naming rules

[Matthias Clasen]

On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 21:02 +0200, Davide Bettio wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think that dbus specification needs to be updated: naming rules for 
> properties aren't clear.  
> 
> I suggest to apply this simple fix:
> - Member (i.e. method or signal) names: 
> + Member (i.e. method, signal or property) names: 
> 

Why do you think properties should be treated like members ? This change
would apply new restriction to property names that have the potential to
render a lot of existing interfaces noncompliant, for very little gain.