DBus properties naming rules

[Matthias Clasen]

On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 16:53 -0600, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:

> 
> i also don't see the necessity for more character variety in property names 
> than in signals, methods or other identifiers in a D-Bus service. what's the 
> use case, exactly, beyond preserving existing malformed services?
> 

They are not malformed. They are perfectly conforming to the current
spec. You are trying to push a deficiency of your dbus implementation in
the spec...

The DeviceKit properties should simply be fixed to conform to the naming
convention thats stated in the spec, and David said that he'd do so.