Session and display bus - an important point (was Re: Draft "StatusNotifierIcon" broken by design)

Filip Štědronský regnarg at seznam.cz
Wed May 19 10:44:05 PDT 2010


Dne 19.5.2010 18:42:30 napsal Aaron J. Seigo:

> The reality, however, is that what you point out won't affect only notifier 
> items, but all communication done over DBus. It's a more general problem 
> that
> 
> will only be addressed by making it easy (as in "transparent") to route DBus 
> over the same network that the X session is on.

Hi
It's not that general, for some things (like notification items)
are more tied to the DISPLAY, while others (e.g. controlling 
your media player, accessing some PIM server, talking to 
Telepathy) are usually connected with the SESSION. I might want
to run an app on a remote display while still talking to 
services in the local session (a Telepathy-based IM client 
is the most obvious example). So what we definitely need is 
two buses --- a session bus _and_ a display bus. Because these 
are two independent scopes.

Filip Štědronský


-- 
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
regnarg at seznam.cz  regnarg at jabber.cz  http://regnarg.ofight.org/
"V upřímné lásce nezáleží na tom, jak úžasného člověka potkáte;
důležité je, aby vám spolu bylo fajn." --anonym
Dne 19.5.2010 18:42:30 napsal Aaron J. Seigo:



-- 
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
regnarg at seznam.cz  regnarg at jabber.cz  http://regnarg.ofight.org/
"V upřímné lásce nezáleží na tom, jak úžasného člověka potkáte;
důležité je, aby vám spolu bylo fajn." --anonym



More information about the xdg mailing list