Spec to define the default terminal?
Vladimir Kudrya
vladimir-csp at yandex.ru
Wed Oct 21 10:51:33 PDT 2015
On 2015-10-21 20:30, Per Olofsson wrote:
>
> I can't find any argument in the bug report for why having a MIME type
> for terminals would be more wrong than x-scheme-handler. Only you
> stating so :-)
>
> But you're right, it is more of a stretch. At least x-scheme-handler is
> about applications opening stuff.
>
MIME types describe files which are to be opened by applications.
Schemes describe URLs to be opened by applications.
Although terminals are applications themselves, in the context of
opening file/URL with some chosen application they are merely a method
of launching that application. So, neither MIME type nor scheme fits here.
On my Debian testing available xsessions are described for display
managers by desktop entries in the '/usr/share/xsessions/' dir. Maybe
something similar could be used for terminals: put desktop entries
describing terminals into '/usr/share/x-terminal-emulators/' or something.
More information about the xdg
mailing list