xdg Digest, Vol 157, Issue 3

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Wed Apr 12 17:00:06 UTC 2017

Hi Alexandre,

On 11 April 2017 at 12:43, Alexandre Franke <alexandre.franke at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> schrieb am Di., 11. Apr. 2017 um 13:26
>> Uhr:
>>> Constructive feedback on the specific form and wording of the CoC is
>>> more than welcome. What would be even better is if you're able to
>>> point to the experiences of other communities, the discussions they've
>>> had, and where they landed. The exact wording isn't irreversibly set
>>> in stone, and I'm sure we'll want to be tweaking it over time. What is
>>> set in stone is that we (the fd.o admins, who unanimously approved
>>> this change) are committed to this CoC, and will not be turning back
>>> from it.
> I encourage you to read https://grep.be/blog//en/retorts/Codes_of_Conduct/

I'm familiar with the Debian CoC, and the discussions around its
introduction. I hadn't read Wouter's specific blog; it's an
interesting point, but I'm not sure I agree. It's definitely something
to consider though, and I'd like to compare it to best practice
elsewhere. Thanks!


More information about the xdg mailing list