[Xesam] [nepomuk-kde] An open-source project for desktop ontology maintenance

[Roberto Guido]

On Friday 08 May 2009 00:55:56 you wrote:
> KDE, GNOME etc are too formal organizations
>
"KDE, GNOME etc" are not committed to engage any open standardization effort 
across other projects.

> Does everyone include OSCAF members?
>
Yes. And also non-members.
If "be an OSCAF member" is mandatory, it literally doesn't means "everyone".

> I'm not in a position to answer this with 100% certainity
>
So, we don't know who is in talk with OSCAF, what they offer and what they 
want. It starts very well.
For the current OSCAF members: publishing organization chart of the current 
board and members list would be very appreciated. Or are those informations 
covered by industrial secret?

> Getting FOSS desktops and enterprise setups to use the same spec is one
> step short of world domination scenario ;)
>
And rely those specs on specific vendors in one step short lack of adoption, 
so failure of any interoperability aims.

It is pretty obvious this discussion cannot produce anything, useless to 
continue. I would prefer to hear the OSCAF's board position at my questions 
in first hand, but probably I'm not "corporate" enough to gain attention by 
this organization.

-- 
Roberto -MadBob- Guido
http://claimid.com/madbob