XKBCONFIG extension: RFP?

[Sergey Udaltsov]

> BTW, when I said "extend the XKB extension", I was thinking in terms
> of adding new functions & protocol to XKB and calling it version 1.1
> (or whatever the next minor release number is), not adding a new parallel
> extension.   I suppose the parallel extension would be easier to change
> incompatibily if it was determined to be badly broken in an initial
> widespread release though, without breaking every other app that uses
> XKB.
That's exactly my thoughts. Also, these extensions are represent
slightly different levels (I'd consider XKBCONFIG as more high level
than XKB). Though, of course, XKBCONFIG would not make much sense
without XKB itself (I am failing to imagine such an implementation).

Sergey