LG events.c changes (was "Re: ")

[Jesse Barnes]

On Wednesday, January 4, 2006 3:22 pm, Deron Johnson wrote:
> > Might I suggest instead that you volunteer to maintain the event
> > layer?
>
> Sorry. No can do. The X server event code is one of the biggest hair
> balls I've ever seen (and I've seen some major ones in my time). I
> can only claim to understand a portion of it. I can volunteer
> myself (or someone else from the LG team) to make sure that future
> additions to the event code are compatible with the LG changes, but I
> don't personally have the cycles to be responsible for such a huge wad
> of gnarly code that I didn't write in the first place and for which
> I have only a partial understanding.

Oh well, it was worth a try. :)  Anyway, the function pointer idea sounds 
good to me, and I haven't heard any objections yet...

Jesse