[xorg-bugzilla-noise] [Bug 1261] prefer iopl() to ioperm() on linux
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Sep 28 22:36:47 UTC 2004
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1261
ajax at nwnk.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |REMIND
------- Additional Comments From ajax at nwnk.net 2004-09-28 15:36 -------
no longer sure about this one. the danger is that iopl(3) gives us all 65536
ports and allows the program to disable interrupts, where ioperm doesn't. from
a reliability standpoint ioperm is safer, and not appreciably slower (assuming
the kernel handles it correctly).
REMIND.
--
Configure bugmail: https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the xorg-bugzilla-noise
mailing list