[Bug 2749] Dynamic modules need visibility cleanups

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Wed Mar 16 15:05:37 PST 2005


Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to    
       
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.     
   
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2749          
     




------- Additional Comments From ajax at nwnk.net  2005-03-16 15:05 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> -xldscope was first introduced in Studio 8 compiler.

that would explain it.

> I don't think using mapfiles would incur PLT overhead (at least on SPARC) - 
> the only disadvantage of using mapfiles is a bit of link time overhead, 
> and missing compiler optimizations such as inlining (or any optimization that
> requires the exact caller/callee relationship) but no more than that.

my worldview is heavily x86 biased (though i'm trying to change that), so you're
probably right.  thanks for the hints.  when i do this for real i'll be sure to
add the bits for the Sun compiler.          
     
     
--           
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email         
     
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


More information about the xorg-bugzilla-noise mailing list