[Bug 2749] Dynamic modules need visibility cleanups
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Wed Mar 16 15:05:37 PST 2005
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2749
------- Additional Comments From ajax at nwnk.net 2005-03-16 15:05 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> -xldscope was first introduced in Studio 8 compiler.
that would explain it.
> I don't think using mapfiles would incur PLT overhead (at least on SPARC) -
> the only disadvantage of using mapfiles is a bit of link time overhead,
> and missing compiler optimizations such as inlining (or any optimization that
> requires the exact caller/callee relationship) but no more than that.
my worldview is heavily x86 biased (though i'm trying to change that), so you're
probably right. thanks for the hints. when i do this for real i'll be sure to
add the bits for the Sun compiler.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the xorg-bugzilla-noise
mailing list