New development model check-in.
daniel at fooishbar.org
Wed Nov 18 01:58:16 PST 2009
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 23:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > So, this is just a quick status check on the new development
> > model. I'd like to hear from anyone with an opinion on how it's
> > working for them.
> > Obviously we're seeing a bit more delay in getting patches into
> > master, but I think that's been mostly positive, with a bit more
> > discussion happening on various patch sets about the best way to do
> > things.
> > Am I providing enough feedback about patches that aren't immediately
> > applied? Do people want more comments on patches which are applied?
> > Has anyone had a patch go missing (neither applied nor replied to)? Am
> > I messing up in some other way?
> It's not working too well for EXA yet; a number of acked patches haven't
> been applied yet.
I'd suggest creating your own tree and sending pull requests, rather
than relying on random patchsets on the list being vaccuumed up ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20091118/c5575ea0/attachment.pgp
More information about the xorg-devel