[PATCH] unifdef -B -DRENDER to always include RENDER code

Keith Packard keithp at keithp.com
Mon Apr 19 15:51:29 PDT 2010


On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:39 +0300, Tiago Vignatti <vignatti at freedesktop.org> wrote:

> But if we go for it, we're going have an implementation that "exceeds" 
> the protocol. Is that valid?

Sure, there's nothing saying that we have to be able to not provide
certain extensions in the sample implementation; the core X protocol
just isn't useable by the bulk of X applications these days without some
of the 'standard' extensions.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100419/b91e51f7/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list