split unrelated changes out of keithp's privates rework

[Keith Packard]

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:24:46 -0700, Jamey Sharp <jamey at minilop.net> wrote:
> Hi Keith!
> 
> I think the important parts of your devPrivates patches will be easier
> to review if you rebase on these patches first. I stuck your
> signed-off-by on them since they're all extracted from your patch-set,
> although I resurrected one comment you deleted from privates.h. If
> there's some better way to tag the commit messages to explain what just
> happened here, feel free to use it. :-)

That looks good to me, thanks for doing this -- I intended to pull these
out myself as I came across them while doing the devPrivates work and
they got all tangled in with that.

I'll apply these to master and then rework my remaining patch on top of that.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100429/a8b1d4ff/attachment.pgp>