[PATCH,HURD] Fix use of deprecated iopl device

[Samuel Thibault]

olafBuddenhagen at gmx.net, le Sat 14 Aug 2010 23:15:01 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:37:22PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > olafBuddenhagen at gmx.net, le Tue 10 Aug 2010 00:02:58 +0200, a écrit :
> 
> > > > -    mach_port_t device,iopl_dev;
> > > > -    memory_object_t iopl_mem;
> > > > +    mach_port_t device,mem_dev;
> > > > +    memory_object_t mem_mem;
> > > 
> > > mem_mem is a rather weird variable name. Perhaps you could rename it to
> > > something clearer? Maybe mem_object...
> > 
> > Well, from the point of view of Xorg, it is a device which gets mapped,
> > even if inside gnumach it is called an object.
> 
> Not sure what you mean. A Mach device (mem_dev in this case) can't
> be mappend directly. You have to obtain a memory object (mem_mem)
> which you can map.  In this case we have memory object that describes
> the physical RAM -- so the first "mem" and the second "mem" in this
> variable name describe two completely different things...

To be honest, I truly don't care about the name at all.  All I do care
about is to get the patch commited eventually.  So give us the variable
names that shall be good and let's be done with it.

Samuel