[PATCH libXext (rev3) 1/5] Backwards compat for newer XSync + older servers
James Jones
jajones at nvidia.com
Thu Dec 2 11:13:06 PST 2010
On Thursday 02 December 2010 10:35:27 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 09:26:27 -0800, James Jones wrote:
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_VERSIONS; i++) {
> > + if (supported_versions[i].major == rep.majorVersion &&
> > + supported_versions[i].minor == rep.minorVersion) {
> > + return &supported_versions[i];
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
>
> Should this look for the highest pair that has major == rep.majorVersion
> and minor <= rep.minorVersion, so you don't need to add every minor
> version that doesn't change the number of errors?
Hmm, that would break the XSyncInitialize() function unless I added code to
dynamically allocate the version structure stored in the display extension
structure and patched up the minor version. I was trying to avoid dynamically
allocating the version info so I wouldn't need to handle allocation failures
in find_display_create_optional() and hand code close display to tear it down.
The current code also matches libXi's event setup behavior, which this code is
based on.
Which do you think is best? Requiring upates to the list of versions on every
protocol version bump, or dynamically allocating the version info stored in
the display ext struct?
-James
> Cheers,
> Julien
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list