[cairo] bitmasks branch
otte at redhat.com
Tue Feb 9 23:07:25 PST 2010
just out of interest: Why do you use negative flags like
FAST_PATH_NO_PAD_REPEAT instead of positive ones like
It feels more natural to me to do the second.
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 17:07 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
> The bitmasks branch here:
> contains the initial reorganization in prepration for the full flags
> branch. Specifically, it adds the flag fields to the fast path tables,
> and it changes the fast path checks to be based on flags.
> I kept finding subtle bugs in it, but now I haven't found any for a
> while. Please take a look and see if you can spot any.
More information about the xorg-devel