[PATCH] exa/mixed: fix gnome-panel corruption
michel at daenzer.net
Wed Feb 17 02:50:39 PST 2010
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:47 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> Both patches are functional on their own, Michel's patch just makes it prettier.
Right, and ironically, bisectability is one of the reasons for my desire
to keep them separate, by keeping the functional change separate from
the (supposedly) only cosmetic one.
> 2010/2/17 Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com>:
> > 2010/2/17 Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net>:
> >> On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> >>> - A mapped pixmap can't be used for acceleration, any decent memory manager
> >>> will refuse this.
> >>> - Source pixmaps migrated with a bounding region are incomplete (from the
> >>> gpu point of view), so do the upload unconditionally, instead of just for
> >>> deferred destination pixmaps.
> >>> - Fixes fd.o bug #26076.
> >>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <daenzer at vmware.com>
> >> For various reasons I'd prefer keeping our patches separate, so I'll be
> >> sending them to Keith separately, with mutual Acked-by: added. Hope this
> >> is okay.
> > Will that screw up bisection in any way?
> > sometimes combining patches if the right thing it means bisection
> > is less likely to mess up.
> > Dave.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
More information about the xorg-devel