[PATCH] dix: remove now-erroneous comment about frozen slave devices.

Adam Jackson ajax at nwnk.net
Mon Feb 22 10:27:44 PST 2010


On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 09:05 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> A direct grab on a slave device through XI2 detaches it, regardless of
> whether the grab is sync or async. So this comment doesn't apply to XI2
> anyway.
> 
> For XI1, aside from your life being miserable already, it doesn't matter as
> XI1 does not have a concept of attachment. You can freeze a device and if
> you don't freeze _all_ other devices at the same time, the master device can
> still happily send events to the client.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>

Acked-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100222/dbddc64f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list