[PATCH xserver 1/3] config: add -fno-strict-aliasing now that it is out of $CWARNFLAGS

Gaetan Nadon memsize at videotron.ca
Thu Feb 25 06:11:06 PST 2010


On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:58 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:

> On Feb 24, 2010, at 05:45, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:34 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > 
> >> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 11:11 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: 
> >>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:07, Keith Packard wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:37:18 -0500, Gaetan Nadon  
> >>>> <memsize at videotron.ca> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> This patch will ensure the xserver continues to suppress the
> >>>>> optimization, based on strict aliasing rules, after the option
> >>>>> is removed from $CWARNFLAGS. There is no change in the object
> >>>>> code produced.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I don't think we need to allow any of the code in the X server to be
> >>>> 'optimized' in this fashion, so I don't see a need to allow for
> >>>> per-directory selection.
> >>> 
> >>> It would be helpful if I had the option to remove this flag from  
> >>> XQuartz.
> >> 
> >> Out of curiosity, what significant benefit have you measured from using
> >> -fstrict-aliasing?
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > Excellent question which I carefully want to avoid :-) 
> > 
> > The problem I want to solve is the following: someone added
> > -fnostrict-aliasing a long time ago and I don't know why. Then it got
> > copied to a number of libraries, then got included in a macro
> > (XORG_CWARNFLAGS), which then got included by over a hundred modules,
> > still not knowing why.
> > 
> > There are over 50 modules that are compiling with no warning flags at
> > all. I don't want to contribute to the spread of this option. The patch
> > is about *transferring* the option out of the macro back to the modules
> > (where the skills are) and let them decide if they want that option or
> > not.
> 
> Additionally, before being copied into XORG_CWARNFLAGS fairly recently, this was only in a handful of modules:
> 
> libICE
> libSM
> libX11
> libXau
> libXfont
> libXft
> libXpm
> libXres
> xorg-server
> (I didn't check xf86-drivers)
> 
> So adding it across the board is rather far-reaching, IMO.  I believe it should only be added back to the modules listed above.
> 

For the sole purpose of providing information:

Modules which had CWARNFLAGS added a year ago *and* did not have
-fno-strict-aliasing option prior to that:


        font=	"util"
        app=	"appres bdftopcf beforelight bitmap editres fonttosfnt fslsfonts fstobdf iceauth \
        	ico listres luit mkcomposecache mkfontscale oclock rendercheck rgb rstart  sessreg setxkbmap \
        	showfont smproxy viewres x11perf xauth xbacklight xbiff xcalc xclipboard xclock xcmsdb xconsole \
        	xcursorgen xdbedizzy xdm xdpyinfo xdriinfo xedit xev xeyes xf86dga xfd xfontsel xfs xfsinfo \
        	xgamma xgc xhost xinit xkbcomp xkbevd xkbprint xkbutils xkill xload xlogo xlsatoms xlsclients \
        	xlsfonts xmag  xman xmessage xmh xmodmap xmore xprop xrandr xrdb xrefresh xscope xset xsetmode \
        	xsetpointer xsetroot xsm xstdcmap xvidtune xvinfo xwd xwininfo xwud"
        lib="	libAppleWM 	libdmx 		libfontenc 	libFS 		libpciaccess 	libWindowsWM \
        	libXaw 		libXcomposite 	libXcursor 	libXdamage 	libXdmcp 	libXext \
        	libXfixes 	libXi 		libXinerama 	libxkbfile 	libXmu 		libXrandr \
        	libXrender 	libXScrnSaver 	libXt 		libXtst 	libXv 		libXvMC \
        	libXxf86dga"
        driver="xf86-input-acecad 	xf86-input-aiptek 	xf86-input-evdev \
        	xf86-input-joystick 	xf86-input-keyboard 	xf86-input-mouse \
        	xf86-input-wacom 	xf86-video-cirrus 	xf86-video-mach64 \
        	xf86-video-qxl 		xf86-video-siliconmotion"



Modules which never had -fno-strict-aliasing nor any warning flags of
any kind and still don't today:


        app="mkfontdir scripts twm xditview xinput"
        lib="libXxf86vm"
        driver="xf86-input-synaptics	xf86-input-vmmouse \
        	xf86-input-void		xf86-video-apm		xf86-video-ark \
        	xf86-video-ast		xf86-video-ati		xf86-video-chips \
        	xf86-video-dummy	xf86-video-fbdev\
        	xf86-video-glint 	xf86-video-i128 	xf86-video-i740	\
        	xf86-video-mga		xf86-video-neomagic	xf86-video-newport \
        	xf86-video-nv		xf86-video-r128 \
        	xf86-video-rendition	xf86-video-s3		xf86-video-s3virge \
        	xf86-video-savage	xf86-video-sis		xf86-video-sisusb \
        	xf86-video-suncg14	xf86-video-suncg3	xf86-video-suncg6 \
        	xf86-video-sunffb 	xf86-video-sunleo	xf86-video-suntcx \
        	xf86-video-tdfx 	xf86-video-tga		xf86-video-trident \
        	xf86-video-tseng	xf86-video-v4l		xf86-video-vesa \
        	xf86-video-vmware	xf86-video-voodoo	xf86-video-wsfb \
        	xf86-video-xgi		xf86-video-xgixp "


Modules which had -fno-strict-aliasing for a long time (prior to
CWARNFLAGS era)


        lib="libICE libSM libX11 libXau libXfont libXft libXpm libXres"
        driver="xf86-video-intel xf86-video-geode xf86-video-radeonhd"
        xserver


My next task is to add warning flags to those modules who don't. If we
wish to preserve status quo (for aliasing), I can define a new variable,
leaving CWARNFLAGS intact so older versions of modules configured
against newer versions of macros aren't affected. 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100225/c2124540/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100225/c2124540/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list