[PATCH] mi: rename miPointerMoved to miPointerMoveNoEvent.

[Peter Hutterer]

On 3/07/10 02:22 , Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:31:19 +1000, Peter Hutterer<peter.hutterer at who-t.net>  wrote:
>> Having miPointerMove and miPointerMoved is confusing, especially since both
>> do the same thing bar the event delivery. Also, miPointerMove calls
>> miPointerMoved which indicates some confusion in the temporal alignment of
>> cause and effect.
>
> <Bikeshed>
> Should we rename miPointerMove too? Perhaps miPointerMoveWithEvent and
> miPointerMoveWithoutEvent?
> </bikeshed>

meh.

I think it's fine as it is. moving the pointer always generates an 
event, the exception being miPointerMoveNoEvent, explicitly labeled so.

Cheers,
   Peter