[PATCH] int10: Remove the vm86 and stub backends

Mark Kettenis mark.kettenis at xs4all.nl
Tue Jul 27 13:47:05 PDT 2010


> From: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:46:59 -0400
> 
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 20:23 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:57:01 +0100
> > > From: Matthew Garrett <mjg at redhat.com>
> > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:15:56PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:32:54PM +0200, ext Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > > > vm86 has been defaulted off since 1.6, and is still a terrible idea=
>  to
> > > > > actually use.  Time to say goodbye.
> > > >=20
> > > > My empirical evidences say that we can't do this.=20
> > >=20
> > > The vm86 code is guaranteed to fail in certain circumstances. The most=20
> > > obvious is anything where the BIOS tries to access address space above=20
> > > 3GB. We're better off killing it and figuring out where the bugs in=20
> > > x86emu are.
> >=20
> > How about fixing those bugs before killing it?
> 
> Some of them are... nontrivial.

Which makes me seriously doubt that these bugs can be found and fixed
fast enough such that users won't be affected.


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list