[RFC] Refactoring of dix/dixutils.c

[Fernando Carrijo]

Vignatti Tiago wrote:

> Jamey Sharp wrote:
> > 
> > The proposed "lookup.c" is mostly about protocol implementation, though,
> > and I'd be happy to see another patch after this series that reorganizes
> > dix/ to highlight the protocol implementation bits. Perhaps a separate
> > top-level proto/ tree?
> 
> exactly. Someway of highlighting protocol implementation only is all that I
> tried to explain in my last email. A top-level proto/ with a proto/utils/
> sounds nice for me.

Would you guys mind if I chose /dix/core and /dix as the new homes for files
related to the core protocol and the protocol support routines, respectively?
Whenever possible, I prefer to avoid the names "utils" or "misc" for I believe
they emphasize the less important side of the coin.

Someone else oppose?