[PATCH] Addition to XFixes for cursor constraint
jwillcox at litl.com
Sat Jun 19 09:58:45 PDT 2010
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:03:49 -0400, Adam Goode <adam at spicenitz.org> wrote:
> > On 06/18/2010 03:08 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:19:04 -0400, Adam Goode <adam at spicenitz.org>
> > >
> > >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
> > >
> > > Disjoint areas have always been the issue with this bug; not sure this
> > > solves it?
> > >
> > Hmm, I guess you're right. But maybe at least Gnome, which doesn't
> > appear to support disjoint areas in the GUI configuration program, could
> > use this?
> If this interface is going to support disjoint regions (which the
> suggested implementation does), then it better have defined semantics
> for how to 'jump' from one area to another. As I recall, That's what
> stopped progress with the RandR cursor confinement.
Yeah, my patches don't do anything about this problem. It just uses the
extents box of the region as the constraint. Of course, nothing stops it
from being smarter in the future -- it's just not within the scope of what
I'm trying to do.
> In any case, with sensible semantics, I wouldn't mind having cursor
> confinement disconnected from the window hierarchy.
Ok, is there anything about these patches that you don't like? What can I
do to get this in to $XORG_NEXT?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xorg-devel