Unmerged trees

[Adam Jackson]

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 13:21 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2010 15:13:43 +0300, Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti at nokia.com> wrote:
> > Hi Keith,
> > 
> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:46:02PM +0200, ext Keith Packard wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm currently tracking four patch sets that have been out for review
> > > for a while:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~vignatti/xserver  bus-cleanup
> > 
> > This one went twice to the mailing list and got some feedback regarding
> > indentation and API breakage (xf86EnableAccess). Both were fixed properly.
> > Unfortunately the set didn't get any sign stamps, but in my opinion it's fine
> > to be pulled already.
> 
> Do you have a suggestion as to who should review this? Ajax? We can prod
> an appropriate person, but I'd like to see it get a Reviewed-by: line
> before merging as it changes some scary internal bits.

Not tested locally, but it looks like pretty straightforward mechanical
changes.

Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100518/40bdb054/attachment.pgp>