[PATCH 3/5 v4] Show Xserver release/version date in DIX & DDX docs

[Mark Kettenis]

> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:21:03 -0700
> From: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>
> 
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Alan Coopersmith
> >> + <!ENTITY % defs SYSTEM "file:///xserver.ent"> %defs;
> > 
> > Just FYI because I toyed around with this a little more. The file://
> > prefix seems to be redundant and just a normal absolute path is fine.
> > Also, any directory prefix is fine since the tools will strip down to
> > just the basename when searching. So, /X11/doc/xserver.ent or any
> > other bogus path would be fine, too.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this.   I've changed both .xml files to use:
> 
> + <!ENTITY % defs SYSTEM "/xserver/doc/xml/xserver.ent"> %defs;
> 
> to at least give people editing the file a hint as to where in the source
> tree it would be.
> 
> >>  CLEAN_DOC_FILES = $(TXT_FILES) $(HTML_FILES) $(PDF_FILES)
> >> +
> >> +# All the files we build depend on the entities
> >> +$(BUILT_DOC_FILES): $(XML_ENT_DIR)/xserver.ent
> >> +
> >> +$(XML_ENT_DIR)/xserver.ent:
> >> +       (cd $(XML_ENT_DIR) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $(@F))
> > 
> > Is $(@F) a gnu makeism? I can't tell, but I don't think so. 
> 
> I first learned about it when using Solaris make, and since it also worked
> with GNU make, I assumed it was fairly common but didn't check, since GNU
> make is currently required to build the Xorg server due to the "sinclude"
> usage in the exported interfaces list generation in the module loader.

That is unfortunate.  On OpenBSD we do build Xorg with our own (BSD)
make.  Please try to avoid using GNU-isms.

Anyway, OpenBSD's make does support @F and @D.