[PATCH] xfree86: Bump classic driver default to 1024x768

Matthew Garrett mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Thu Nov 25 12:32:18 PST 2010


On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:14:36PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > 
> > We provide pretty much no support for hardware that's the same vintage 
> > as the monitors you're talking about. Why would the people using these 
> > monitors be running current versions of X? Why would they not be able to 
> > write an xorg.conf? Why are they more important than the people who have 
> > to deal with the more common cases of missing EDID?
> 
> And just how certain are you that 1024x768 is going to help all those 
> cases with missing EDID compared to 800x600?

Because the common case for missing EDID is a device capable of at least 
1024x768.

> This makes me want to start arguing for making 640x480 the default.

I've got a display here that's limited to 15.6KHz, so there'd still be 
broken devices.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list