Who actually does have root? [was Re: Respository ...]
Dave Airlie
airlied at gmail.com
Sun Nov 28 14:15:07 PST 2010
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:39:48AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:40:54PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> We could probably better define this sort of things, again fd.o has
>>> >> been a pretty haphazard setup based on volunteer time and effort, but
>>> >> again hopefully we can get some escalation procedures in place that
>>> >> are less public.
>>> >>
>>> >> Dave.
>>> >
>>> > In fact, more visibility is what is needed, not less!
>>> >
>>> > Just like with the fundamental change that happened with the X.org
>>> > board earlier this year: we need to know who is doing what, before we
>>> > can trust it.
>>> >
>>> > In my very first email i asked who all had root access to the fd.o
>>> > machines. I haven't got an answer to that yet.
>>> >
>>>
>>> ssh annarchy.freedesktop.org
>>> cat /etc/passwd | grep root
>>>
>>> Pretty much gives you the list of fd.o admins to anyone who has
>>> access, again X.org isn't the only project hosted on fd.o,
>>> so there are admins from other projects who have root.
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>
>> For annarchy:
>>
>> Daniel Stone
>> Keith Packard
>> Carl Worth
>> Eric Anholt
>> Thomas Vander Stichele
>> Adam Jackson
>> Rob McQueen
>> Benjamin Close
>> Behdad Esfahbod
>> Tollef Fog Heen
>>
>> Is this the same list for all fd.o machines? What about gabe, which is
>> another machine that this change could've happened from as well.
oops daughter hit send,
I don't know of any admins that are different across machines.
And no it couldn't have been done on gabe, only on kemper actually but
generally users don't have access to kemper.
Dave.
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list