[PATCH xorg-docs 3/3] Add Makefile XML profiling support

[Matt Dew]

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Gaetan Nadon <memsize at videotron.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 15:55 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 20:27 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> I got:
> runtime error: file /usr/X11R7/share/sgml/X11/xorg.xsl line 254 element
> call-template
> The called template 'add-xml-base' was not found.
>
> This is related to the xml:base attribute which is defined in the W3C XML
> Base recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/.
>
> The attribute xml:base may be inserted in XML documents to specify a base
> URI other
> than the base URI of the document or external entity.
>
> I found on the net a stylesheet that does the same thing as xorg.xsl:
>
> http://svn.traduc.org/blame.php?repname=lfs&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fblfs%2Fstylesheets%2Flfs-xsl%2Fdocbook-xsl-snapshot%2Fcommon%2Fstripns.xsl&rev=659&sc=0
>
> Our xorg stylesheet is calling an "add-xml-base" template that does not
> exist. In the above stylesheet found on the next, this template is defined
> in-line in the file.
>
> <xsl:template name="add-xml-base">
>   <xsl:if test="not(@xml:base)">
>     <xsl:variable name="base">
>     [...]
>
> When I build xorg-docs, I always get this warning:
>
> WARNING: cannot add @xml:base to node set root element.  Relative paths may
> not work.
>
> There must be some differences in the docbook xls software packages or the
> the version of the xsltproc that we use.
>
> If you have run into this, most likely others will. Other packages such as
> libSM would use the new version of xorg.xsl as well. Does it fail the same
> way?
>
> Just wondering if you had the same problem with other documents.
>
> In any case, we need more users testing as there are quite a variety of xsl
> packages out there.
>

Alan,
   Which OS/distro do you get this on?

Does tinderbox try to build documentation?
Matt

Matt