[PATCH x11proto] Add two more symbols for printing grab and window trees
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Sun Jun 19 17:23:15 PDT 2011
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:51:56PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:10:59AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > These two keysyms provide exciting new possibilities of a close relationship
> > between our valued users and hard-working developers through innovative
> > logging solutions. Such keysyms truly pave new ground in the reponsiveness
> > to bug reports and and debug-ability of grabs.
> >
> > For unprecedented uses of these keysyms, see the patches here:
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/5936/
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/5935/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> > ---
> >
> > man, if that doesn't sell it, I don't know what would.
>
> Had we all sold X this well instead of trash-talking it at every turn,
> Wayland might not exist today. ;)
>
> > --- a/XF86keysym.h
> > +++ b/XF86keysym.h
> > @@ -229,4 +229,5 @@
> > #define XF86XK_ClearGrab 0x1008FE21 /* kill application with grab */
> > #define XF86XK_Next_VMode 0x1008FE22 /* next video mode available */
> > #define XF86XK_Prev_VMode 0x1008FE23 /* prev. video mode available */
> > -
> > +#define XF86XK_PrintWindows 0x1008FE24 /* print window tree */
> > +#define XF86XK_PrintGrabs 0x1008FE25 /* print all active grabs */
>
> I'd prefer to have LogWindowTree and LogGrabInfo if possible. Is this
> OK with you?
deal. amended locally, will push in a bit.
>
> If so, we should get an xproto out with these ASAP, and either way:
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>
Yeah, I've asked KiBi to hold back on the x11proto release so I can get this
in. Will do a release later this week.
Cheers,
Peter
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list