[PATCH inputproto] Add minimal asciidoc syntax

[Matt Dew]

On 03/15/2011 07:01 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 09:12 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> asciidoc also converts to docbook. so while there would be some
>> inconsistency, it wouldn't be that bad.
>>
> I thought about that. The strategy would that before it matures,
> asciidoc provides
> a "rapid development process". At one point a more formal docbook
> version is produced
> with all the bells and whistles and integration with the rest of the
> documentation.

No arguing writing in docbook can be a bit 'challenging' for some things.

I'm all for keeping it easy for the devs to edit and review patches.  I 
have a nervous twitch in my stomach about format proliferation though. 
I do not want to end up back where we were a year ago.

The doc will never be considered 'done' though, docs never are.  Someone 
will have to make the call at some point and say 'close enough, convert 
to docbook.'

>
> I tried with the makefile to get a feel for how it builds and look. It
> is an improvement
> over the flat file.

Matt