[PULL] Xorg/darwin related build fixes, Xquartz crash fix
keithp at keithp.com
Mon Jan 16 15:46:45 PST 2012
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:29:22 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu at apple.com> wrote:
> Well the change that is being reverted *does* cause a regression, so
> it should be reverted on that grounds alone. It will be no worse than
> our released servers which didn't free that memory. Of course this
> happens in screen destroy, so it's not like it was happening anywhere
> other than shutdown in most use cases.
We've got some prototype patches that eliminate server regen; maybe
those can land for 1.13 ;-)
I'll merge your sequence and await updates on the memory leak later
on. Leaking is better than crashing anyways.
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the xorg-devel