[PATCH inputproto 0/5] specs: fix various minor problems in asciidoc source

Chase Douglas chase.douglas at canonical.com
Wed Jan 25 14:59:34 PST 2012

On 01/25/2012 11:42 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> On 12-01-25 05:30 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 11:03 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
>>> See the attached html file in the reply to this e-mail.
>>> Gaetan Nadon (5):
>>>   specs: Edit titles for section 3 and 4
>>>   specs: remove older manually typed in section number
>>>   specs: fix Appendix A title
>>>   specs: use subsections to group use cases description
>>>   specs: replace hard coded number in some "See section" references
>> I'm ok with each of these changes. Not having any numbers for sections
>> makes references when reading the plain text a bit more cumbersome, but
>> anyone who is interested can probably figure it out. We should all move
>> to the digital age of HTML by now anyways :).
> I noticed Asciidoc has a text format as an output format. I can give it
> a try.
> Perhaps it has the toc and section numbers.

The hope is that we the asciidoc source is good enough as a document. It
makes it easier to follow if that's all you have. I still think it's
good enough without section numbers.

-- Chase

More information about the xorg-devel mailing list