[PATCH] cvt: add -i/--interlaced to documentation

[Alan Coopersmith]

On 05/20/12 04:54 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alon Levy <alevy at redhat.com>

cvt.c currently says:

/*
 * I'm not documenting --interlaced for obvious reasons, even though I did
 * implement it. I also can't deny having looked at gtf here.
 */

Are those reasons no longer valid?  (Sadly they're not obvious to me.)

At the very least a patch to document --interlaced should remove the comment
claiming it's intentionally undocumented, preferably explain why the change
in intentions has been made.

-- 
	-Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
	 Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc