[PATCH 0/7] Resume breaking ABI

[Keith Packard]

Colin Harrison <colin.harrison at virgin.net> writes:

> Hi,
>> Probably needs to be 'unsigned int' instead. I still don't know if we
>> can use the enum type here.

> My compiler is happy with 'unsigned int', which is the safest bet I reckon
> for all (I had to dig out my K&R ANSI C on this...and read it once
> more!)

Care to submit a patch which updates all of the changed bitfields to
unsigned?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20121005/23a256a5/attachment.pgp>