xorg-server-1.14.1.902 - build error

[Peter Hutterer]

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 01:49:22PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 11:45 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:35:56AM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> >> Ping?
> >
> > I've merged this into my tree now, will be in the next pull request
> >
> > Cheers,
> >     Peter
> 
> Thanks Peter.
>    Any idea when that pull request will be?  xserver 1.14.3 has been a
> mess schedule wise.  I'd like to get it out so I can get back onto a
> 6-week schedule again but I'd like to get this one in .3 instead of
> waiting for .4 just so we can be done with it.
> 
>    If that pull request'll be this week, I'll wait until next Thursday
> before releasing  1.13.4 otherwise I'll just pop out 1.13.4 tomorrow.

pull request is out.
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2013-September/037699.html

Cheers,
   Peter

> >> On 08/26/2013 03:06 PM, Matt Dew wrote:
> >>> Keith,
> >>>    I saw you did a R-b back on Jun 21, did that make it into trunk that I
> >>> can cherry-pick?
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> Matt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Chris Clayton <chris2553 at gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:chris2553 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      Hi Matt.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      On 06/27/13 02:46, Matt Dew wrote:
> >>>
> >>>          On 06/26/2013 01:20 AM, Chris Clayton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      [snip]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>              I see that 1.14.2 has been released without any of the above
> >>>              happening.
> >>>              That's no big deal, but Matt's statement in the release
> >>>              notice "that
> >>>              this release doesn't work with gcc 4.8-snapshot" is a bit
> >>>              misleading. As
> >>>              I reported, it won't *build* with gcc-4.8 snapshot. Once my
> >>>              patch is
> >>>              applied, it builds fine and, from my experience over the
> >>>              last two weeks,
> >>>              it works fine too.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>          Hi Chris,
> >>>              I didn't feel there was enough time to properly bake that
> >>>          patch so I
> >>>          didn't include it in 1.14.2.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       From a quick look at the source, I see that my patch has not been
> >>>      applied yet. Like the 1.14.2 release candidates, 1.14.2.902 does not
> >>>      build without it when the compiler is a recent 4.8 gcc release.
> >>>
> >>>      Chris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>               It wasn't my intent to be misleading but to me, in this
> >>>          regard, 'not
> >>>          building' is the same as 'doesn't work'.
> >>>
> >>>          Matt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>              Chris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> >> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> >> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
> >>